Outstanding Universal Value

Posted on 13. January 2006 um 20:11 Uhr
» International UNESCO World Heritage

The official text of UNESCO's World Heritage Convention tells us:


Article 11
2.On the basis of the inventories submitted by States in accordance with paragraph 1, the Committee shall establish, keep up to date and publish, under the title of "World Heritage List," a list of properties forming part of the cultural heritage and natural heritage, as defined in Articles 1 and 2 of this Convention, which it considers as having outstanding universal value in terms of such criteria as it shall have established. An updated list shall be distributed at least every two years.
reference:http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/

In April 2005 the City of Kazan (Republic of Tartarstan, Russian Federation) hosted an expert meeting to define this three world more clearly.

In a Background Paper provided by ICOMOS it is written:


Criteria of Outstanding Universal Value

Each identification for the world list of monuments and sites of outstanding universal value in the sense of the Convention means - just as in individual countries the preparation of national or regional monument lists - documentation of monuments and sites or cultural properties on the basis of an evaluation following certain criteria. These criteria, however, may change from time to time and we should be aware of the change of values that this entails. For example, the so-called artistic value depends to a certain degree on the taste of the time; it is therefore not an absolute but only a relative value. Also in the past decades there have been changes in what the societies of the various regions of the world consider to be important within the chronological/regional framework of the history of humankind. This also finds expression, for instance, in the considerably expanded "modern" definition of monument.
While in our time there is a strong dominance of purely economic values, in former times there used to be fierce discussion about cultural value orientation, eg if we think of the famous querelle des anciens et modernes of the 17th century in France - the question whether outstanding universal values could only be achieved by imitating the Antiquity or if expressions of the creativity of one's own time were also allowed.
reference:http://whc.unesco.org/temp/POL/ICOMOS%20OUV%20Paper%20final.doc

IUCN (The World Conservation Union) states concerning the concept of outstanding universal value:


OUV is thus the central construct of the Convention and IUCN considers the following issues are relevant in defining its meaning:

  • Outstanding: For properties to be of OUV they should be exceptional. IUCN has noted in several expert meetings that: “the World Heritage Convention sets out to define the geography of the superlative – the most outstanding natural and cultural places on Earth” (Thorsell, 1997);

  • Universal: The scope of the Convention is global in relation to the significance of the properties to be protected as well as its importance to all people of the world. By definition properties cannot be considered for OUV from a national or regional perspective; and

  • Value: What makes a property outstanding and universal is its “value” which implies clearly defining the worth of a property, ranking its importance based on clear and consistent standards, and assessing its quality.

reference:http://whc.unesco.org/temp/POL/FINAL%20IUCN%20Background%20Document%20for%20Kazan%2004.04.05.doc

In Paragraph 49 of the Operational Guidelines the issue is described:

Outstanding universal value means cultural and/or natural significance which is so exceptional as to transcend national
boundaries and to be of common importance for present and future generations of all humanity. As such, the permanent
protection of this heritage is of the highest importance to the international community as a whole. The Committee defines
the criteria for the inscription of properties on the World Heritage List.
reference:http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide05-en.pdf

The topic offers a wide field for further discussion. The importance for UNESCO's World Heritage Convention is immense.


Tatar part of Kazan in the early 20th century.(reference: Wikipedia, GNU)


Pingbacks

  1. Who Owns the Past? - Worldheritage Forum

Comments

  • Travelluver wrote on 17.01.2006:

    Hi Matthias,

    Well, I've always wanted to see the 3 castles of Bellinzona since I came here in 1999. At that time, I came with a big tour group whose coach only passed by Bellinzona and the tour guide mentioned that this city is known for her 3 castles. I was very disappointed that I didn't get to see them. So I decided that my second visit to Switzerland must include the Bellinzona castles. And last year, I managed to book my tour with this company that takes people to the non-commercialised areas of Switzerland - very nice.

    I think that the 2 castles I visited, Castel Grande and Castello di Montebello are very well preserved. I personally prefer the later as it really gives the feeling of the medieval times when knights wore shining armour. It makes one think back of those times when they fought with old weapons through the castle walls.

    At that time when we went there, there were not many visitors (less than 10) as the bulk of the people go there in summer when you can see them relaxing (sitting or lying down) on the castle grounds, enjoying the summer warmth. Nevertheless, after a 15 min walk up to Castello di Montebello from the heart of the city, we had a lovely lunch-picnic on its castle ground.

    At night, the lights at the castles make them look very very impressive as seen from the motorway.

    What I would like to do the next time when I go there is to take a look at the museums that each castle has. Perhaps you could tell me if they are worth a visit if you happen to go there.

    I hope I've answered your questions. Otherwise, please do not hesitate to ask me.

    Take care.

  • Matthias Ripp from Bamberg wrote on 24.01.2006:

    Thank you very much!

Your comment

How to use BBcode?